Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
M
mu-map
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Tamino Huxohl
mu-map
Commits
27c9e209
Commit
27c9e209
authored
2 years ago
by
Tamino Huxohl
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
include slice removal from mu_map in the dataset
parent
3178da67
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
mu_map/data/datasets.py
+63
-15
63 additions, 15 deletions
mu_map/data/datasets.py
with
63 additions
and
15 deletions
mu_map/data/datasets.py
+
63
−
15
View file @
27c9e209
...
...
@@ -6,9 +6,63 @@ import numpy as np
from
torch.utils.data
import
Dataset
HEADER_DISC_FIRST
=
"
discard_first
"
HEADER_DISC_LAST
=
"
discard_last
"
def
discard_slices
(
row
,
μ_map
):
"""
Discard slices based on the flags in the row of th according table.
The row is expected to contain the flags
'
discard_first
'
and
'
discard_last
'
.
:param row: the row of meta configuration file of a dataset
:param μ_map: the μ_map
:return: the μ_map with according slices removed
"""
_res
=
μ_map
if
row
[
HEADER_DISC_FIRST
]:
_res
=
_res
[
1
:]
if
row
[
HEADER_DISC_LAST
]:
_res
=
_res
[:
-
1
]
return
_res
def
align_images
(
image_1
:
np
.
ndarray
,
image_2
:
np
.
ndarray
):
"""
Align one image to another on the first axis (z-axis).
It is assumed that the second image has less slices than the first.
Then, the first image is shortened in a way that the centers of both images lie on top of each other.
:param image_1: the image to be aligned
:param image_2: the image to which image_1 is aligned
:return: the aligned image_1
"""
assert
(
image_1
.
shape
[
0
]
>
image_2
.
shape
[
0
]
),
f
"
Alignment is based on the fact that image 1 has more slices
{
image_1
.
shape
[
0
]
}
than image_2
{
image_
.
shape
[
0
]
}
"
# central slice of image 2
c_2
=
image_2
.
shape
[
0
]
//
2
# image to the left and right of the center
left
=
c_2
right
=
image_2
.
shape
[
0
]
-
c_2
# central slice of image 1
c_1
=
image_1
.
shape
[
0
]
//
2
# select center and same amount to the left/right as image_2
return
image_1
[(
c_1
-
left
)
:
(
c_1
+
right
)]
class
MuMapDataset
(
Dataset
):
def
__init__
(
self
,
dataset_dir
:
str
,
csv_file
:
str
=
"
meta.csv
"
,
images_dir
:
str
=
"
images
"
self
,
dataset_dir
:
str
,
csv_file
:
str
=
"
meta.csv
"
,
images_dir
:
str
=
"
images
"
,
discard_μ_map_slices
:
bool
=
True
,
):
super
().
__init__
()
...
...
@@ -16,8 +70,10 @@ class MuMapDataset(Dataset):
self
.
dir_images
=
os
.
path
.
join
(
dataset_dir
,
images_dir
)
self
.
csv_file
=
os
.
path
.
join
(
dataset_dir
,
csv_file
)
# read CSV file and from that access DICOM files
self
.
table
=
pd
.
read_csv
(
self
.
csv_file
)
# read csv file and from that access dicom files
self
.
discard_μ_map_slices
=
discard_μ_map_slices
def
__getitem__
(
self
,
index
:
int
):
row
=
self
.
table
.
iloc
[
index
]
...
...
@@ -27,25 +83,17 @@ class MuMapDataset(Dataset):
recon
=
pydicom
.
dcmread
(
recon_file
).
pixel_array
mu_map
=
pydicom
.
dcmread
(
mu_map_file
).
pixel_array
recon
,
mu_map
=
self
.
align
(
recon
,
mu_map
)
if
self
.
discard_μ_map_slices
:
mu_map
=
discard_slices
(
row
,
mu_map
)
recon
=
align_images
(
recon
,
mu_map
)
return
recon
,
mu_map
def
__len__
(
self
):
return
len
(
self
.
table
)
def
align
(
self
,
recon
,
mu_map
):
assert
recon
.
shape
[
0
]
>
mu_map
.
shape
[
0
],
f
"
Alignment is based on the fact that the NoAC Recon has more slices
{
recon
.
shape
[
0
]
}
than the attenuation map
{
mu_map
.
shape
[
0
]
}
"
cm
=
mu_map
.
shape
[
0
]
//
2
left
=
cm
right
=
mu_map
.
shape
[
0
]
-
cm
cr
=
recon
.
shape
[
0
]
//
2
recon
=
recon
[(
cr
-
left
):(
cr
+
right
)]
return
recon
,
mu_map
__all__
=
[
MuMapDataset
.
__name__
]
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment